Who covers neighborhood news better? The citywide newspaper? Or the independent neighborhood blog?
In cities where a crop of such bloggers are chipping away at newspapers’ dominance of the neighborhood beat while racking up both page views and ad revenue — like Seattle — the answer to that question is obvious.
It’s all about the blogs, baby.
Neighborhood news blogs — blogs dedicated to writing about their community for their community — cover news with a detail city newspapers never thought necessary, and an entrepreneur’s ambition many of them forgot.
That doesn’t mean newspapers can’t compete in the hyperlocal space. They’ll just want to re-examine a few things before they do.
Because even though their reporters have more than enough talent and resources to meet bloggers on their turf, there’s one thing they often don’t have — one thing that hurts old media’s chances of beating bloggers at their own game — freedom.
Here are two ways that freedom gives neighborhood bloggers a big advantage in hyperlocal coverage.
The 40-hour work week
An independent news blogger is free to research, report and write about his beat 24 hours a day. A staff blogger at a city newspaper is not. For established media that want to compete in hyperlocal space, that’s a problem.
The first reason is trust. There’s something endearing and authentic about the authority an independent blogger earns simply by living in the neighborhood she covers. For readers skeptical of the mass media, that’s a big draw. Mechanical qualities like objectivity and “professionalism,” which are imperfect and suspect in many readers’ minds, can’t compete.
Proximity and consistency build credibility on the neighborhood beat, independent bloggers have shown us. Yet city reporters are often held to neither. Newspapers should think about that.
Then there’s the 40-hour work week. Labor laws, scheduling policies and the dread of overtime pay in tough times keep many newspaper editors from letting events set their reporters’ agendas — which leads to the most organic, flexible coverage.
Independent bloggers, on the other hand, behave like a budding business. They have no timesheets. They work as hard as they have to. That gives them a much greater chance to connect with their readers — a must in the ultra-competitive digital space.
When the same voice tells readers about the late-night fire, the early morning development meeting and the afternoon parade — seven days a week — they will come to trust that voice above every other voice. But under most newspaper work policies, even if reporters want to be there for their community 24/7, they can’t. That limits the speed and depth at which they can forge that connection.
Reporters are limited by their schedules. Bloggers are limited only by their ambition.
Control of product
Newspaper bloggers are on the front lines of coverage. But when it comes to changing or modifying their product to fit readers’ needs, they’re nearly powerless.
When newspaper bloggers see the need for a tweak in their blog’s design, they can’t just do it. They have to go through an editor. A designer. A publisher. The online department. People with the power to make decisions they can’t make themselves.
That system, designed to make the most of the talents of several people, has served the newspaper industry well for decades. But in the race for innovation, such a system can be fatally slow.
In the time it takes a newspaper reporter to write an e-mail to a supervisor proposing a change to her product, an independent blogger already made it on his.
The longer the distance between the worker and the decision-maker, the slower the innovation.
But speeding up this process isn’t so much about giving more control to the reporter as to the reader. Newspapers should feel OK with trying things and seeing what works with their audience.
They should be more comfortable making changes bit-by-bit, without needing to pass it by ten different people and with the relaxed understanding that whatever they change can be changed right back.
Slow, careful deliberation is too much of a crutch. It’s more important to be able to respond to your readers — quickly — than it is to make the perfect choice on the first try.
So now what?
Newspapers don’t have to compete with bloggers in the hyperlocal space. They can choose to focus on what they do best — citywide coverage — and build a collaborative, linking relationship with the neighborhood blogs that with their shrinking resources newspapers have a tough chance of beating anyway.
But many will want to compete. It’s tough to turn down the opportunity to explore as promising a niche as neighborhood bloggers have discovered, cultivated and begun to fill. The question is, how will newspapers manage their disadvantages so that the effort will be worth it?
We’ll see.
For more on the future of Journalism, subscribe to the Eat Sleep Publish RSS feed.


{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
What a disappointing post. You’re very lucky to have a paycheck from a newspaper you so clearly disdain that allows you to undercut it here.
Monica – You’re very right that local bloggers are finding success where newspapers aren’t largely because of their flexibility, but I think that it’s dangerous (from a health standpoint) to romanticize the more-than-40 hour work week.
It works for startups because you’re aiming for a huge payout (someone buys the company, IPO, etc), but it doesn’t strike me as a sustainable business model.
In terms of finding long term solutions for the news industry, I think we need to be looking for solutions that accommodate the 40-hour work week.
Mark – Did you read the post? There’s a BIG difference between “disdain” for newspapers, and helpful criticism. Toyota rules the automaking world largely because they listen to their employees suggestions and implement them.
I think you’re right regarding the big newspapers (Seattle Times and Seattle PI). Fast breaking local news is not going to be covered by them as quickly as your local blogger.
I’m not ready to stop reading newspapers in print or online. I think they do provide a lot of value that you can’t find by reading a blog. I like sitting outside with a newspaper on a nice sunny day reading and eating my lunch. I find that it is relaxing to disconnect from the computer to read something.
The other thing that I don’t think can be replaced is the fact that companies want newspapers to still cover them by writing an article about them. While it’s nice to get press from a local blogger, there’s still the credibility of being in a newspaper that can’t be replaced.
So yes, newspapers can’t be as fast as blogger in releasing the story, but does it really matter if news is published by a blogger at 11pm instead of a local newspaper later the next day?
That supposed cachet won’t last for long if newspapers or any other old-media organizations don’t realize that their readers are READING at all hours. We have a late-night prime time that is almost as busy as late-morning prime time. Those people know and appreciate when we have the story and nobody else does. (We hear it at the community meetings we attend, when our coverage is brought up by people who don’t even necessarily realize one of us is in the room. Happened to me tonight.) Yes, it does matter. And after a while, if Newspaper X thinks it can rest on its cachet and just go ahead and publish news the day after it happens, the buzz among readers will go to Website Y, which publishes news when it happens.
To Jason’s earlier comment re: romanticizing the beyond-40-hour week … I actually think it’s the 40-hour week that’s been overly romanticized. We now have the tools to integrate work into life, and there’s no reason to separate the two, if you choose to be in this business. I am “on” around the clock, but that also means that because my workplace comes with me if I have my bag with laptop/aircard/cameras, I can say “OK, I’m going out for a two-hour ferry ride at 2 pm” – and know that if something happens, with the help of both my partner and also the many reader-contributors who assist in crowdsourcing without even being asked, I can cover breaking news before that ferry gets back to the dock. I’m used to it because I was always an “exempt” employee in the “old media” world and wound up staying at work 11 or so hours all day, then (once the Interwebs arrived) being online via e-mail or whatever else at home.
I think gathering and delivering information is a business like few others, a vital public service. To be in it, you have to gut-check whether you want to be “on” all the time. If you don’t, maybe it’s not the right business. Before I chose to get out of the conventional media after more than a quarter-century, I was one of those slave-driver bosses who couldn’t understand why some reporters and photographers didn’t answer the phone or the page when called in to handle offhours breaking news. Why did they choose this business, I would wonder, if they didn’t want to serve when desperately needed?
But I’m glad to know that on the flip side, there are people like Monica continuing to try to effect change from within, to advocate that those who want to do more, not be restrained.
Tracy – That is an excellent point: we do now have the tools to better integrate work and life.
A plea for “sane work hours” is a bit hypocritical coming from me, since I work full-time and then run Eat Sleep Publish completely outside of that. I understand how some people have a drive to be doing things almost all the time, and I think that’s a good quality for someone who is covering the news.
That said, I also understand the value of disconnecting. I try to do it once a year, where I take a week (usually in Colorado) and stop checking my blog and my email every 15 seconds. I can’t tell you how much that helps my overall life/stress levels.
I guess my larger point is that if possible, a solution that offers:
I read recently in Brain Rules that chronic stress takes a much bigger toll on humans that we’ve assumed. If we’re reshuffling the way the industry works, I want to try and preserve some ways of being healthy.