In last weekend’s New York Times business section there was a special note about their financial tables:
It looks like they’re finally taking Scott Karp’s advice seriously and cutting back on the useless print expenses. I’m sure other papers will follow.
Subscribe by RSS Stay up to date by adding the Eat Sleep Publish RSS feed to your reader of choice. |
On TwitterJoin over 3,000 people getting day-to-day thoughts on publishing from Jason by following @jasonp → |
 Eat Sleep Publish is a Seattle-based blog that explores the difficulties and opportunities currently facing the publishing industry. Read more → |
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
Is it standard practice to list then ? I feel like I always see it the other way. If so, I like the change.
Frankly, I don’t pick up the paper version of very many dailies anymore, so I can’t tell you with much authority.
I do think, however, that most papers need to take a serious look at what they’re printing and why. A lot of what papers do “by tradition” is because the paper used to be a “pretty good tool” for the job.
Of course now, for most of those things (classifieds come to mind), the internet is far better.